Impact of different cutoff criteria on rate of (central) auditory processing disorders diagnosis using the central test battery

  • Mohsin Ahmed Shaikh | mashaikh.audiology@gmail.com Department of Audiology and Speech Language Pathology, Bloomsbury University of Pennsylvania, United States.
  • Lisa Fox-Thomas Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, United States.
  • Denise Tucker Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, United States.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to quantify how the use of two different cutoff criteria affects the test failure rate and potential diagnosis of central auditory processing disorder ([C]APD) in a sample of children subjected to central auditory processing ([C]AP) assessment. Test failure rates for the central test battery (CTB) using two different cutoff criteria (1 and 2 SDs below the mean) were measured retrospectively for 98 children who completed (C)AP assessment. The rates of potential (C)APD diagnosis ranged from 86.8% [when a 1 standard deviation (SD) cutoff was used] to 66.2% (when a 2 SD cutoff was used). The current use of two different cutoffs for the CTB has a large impact on the diagnostic rate for (C)APD. These findings have clinical implications for the diagnosis of (C)APD due to the widespread use of the CTB in the United States for the assessment of (C)APD in children. Thus, it is important to create awareness among audiologists that use of the 2 SDs cutoff criterion is recommended for reducing false positives (error).

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Mohsin Ahmed Shaikh, Department of Audiology and Speech Language Pathology, Bloomsbury University of Pennsylvania
Assistant Professor,Department of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania
Lisa Fox-Thomas, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Associate Professor, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Denise Tucker, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Associate Professor, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Published
2016-11-25
Info
Issue
Section
Original Articles
Keywords:
Central test battery, auditory processing disorder, cutoff criteria.
Statistics
  • Abstract views: 1447

  • PDF: 845
  • HTML: 466
How to Cite
Shaikh, M. A., Fox-Thomas, L., & Tucker, D. (2016). Impact of different cutoff criteria on rate of (central) auditory processing disorders diagnosis using the central test battery. Audiology Research, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2016.158